With a system so divided can we be sure there is somebody there vouching for the integrity of the voting?
As we get closer to election day, Wikileaks dumps & investigations like Veritas Project show us that we may now have a more basic problem than income inequality or racial discrimination.
A little history:
Obama won the election of 2012 because his share of the Latino votes rose a full 4 points to 71% giving him a full 700,000 plus additional votes from Latinos. This was called a seismic shift in the voting, but the figures didn’t add up, so after the election I decided to do some research.
What got me going was when by sheer chance I happened onto a conversation of four old geyser veterans at the Veteran Hospital in Loma Linda. They swore (laughing so hard they were nearly falling off their chairs)
In 2012 the ELECTION was STOLEN.
“How so?” I asked
“It was bought with food stamps.”
They were emphatic that Obama and a swarm of democratic volunteers on the ground paid for by Soros, were spreading the word that, ”You register to vote, vote for Obama and if he wins he will make you, and all your family legal and he may also even give you food stamps,”
“They are broadcasting the message in Spanish in Mexico,” said one gray-haired geyser
I was never able to absolutely prove this last but SLOWLY THE FACTS ARE COMING IN on this basic issue. In many cases like voting twice or assuming a false identity in order to commit voter fraud is a felony.
Using the Freedom of Information Act Judicial Watch has affirmed the food stamp message was in fact going out to Mexico They have it in writing in Spanish.
In 2013 when I was doing this research there was much circumstantial evidence that the election of 2012 had had no moral oversight, but no hard core evidence that could stand up in a court of law so I dropped it.
This was the circumstantial evidence that I was able to verify.
Democratic benefactor George Soros had refused to fund Super PAC ads (of which he disapproved) but he was willing to give to a massive “boots on the ground” effort to get out the vote. You see, presidents are not only elected by the old, traditional PR war: “How they define themselves vs. how the opposition defines them” In fact, election G.W. Bush & election Obama 2012 were both won by GETTING OUT THE VOTE.
This is a good thing, but where it goes awry is when people not entitled to vote are indeed voting and influencing the result.
G.W. Bush used the Christian Right and the churches to corral the elderly church goers who would not normally turn out to vote. In this way he won.
Obama rounded up the Latino men and women, unable to understand the language or the process, and also unlikely to go to the polling booths had they not been taken there AND TOLD HOW TO VOTE. With no demand for voter ID there was no security these voters were indeed legal.
Easy to justify it for boots on the ground who felt Congress had cheated them by not passing the Gang of Eight legalization bill. What a mess. It still doesn’t make Obama a legal president if he were elected by voters who were not legal.
And here ARE SOME MORE FISHY FACTS that I uncovered in 2013:
- The Ohio Secretary of State has admitted that multiple Ohio counties have more registered voters than residents.
- Federal records show 160 counties in ten states have over 100 percent voter registration.
- Twelve Indiana counties have more registered voters than residents.
- It has been found that more than 24 million voter registrations are invalid, yet they still remain on the rolls, nation wide.
- There are 1.8 million dead citizens that are still on the voter roll
- A judge in Texas has just ruled (sic) that voter ID is discriminatory. Do the courts support rule of law?
- The fact of the matter is that more than 2.75 million Americans are registered to vote in more than one state.I concluded then at best all I could say was monkey business.
The problem of voter fraud is actually easy to fix if our leaders and the people openly and honestly support a system free of corruption; the American system that gave us prosperity and freedom.
In the constitution each branch of government is given the power to protect itself from excess. Our democracy is designed so that the people can root out corruption. It is only because UP TILL NOW we have been able to control the corruption that destroys the rest of the world. Because UP TILL NOW we have supported a good system, America has been rich in comparison to the rest of the world. But in 2016 there is a good chance these past checks and balances are going away. It is a good country and we built it. We built it because for the most part we had an honest system and honest leaders and rule of law. There is a reason why Mexico is a poor country, and America rich, same continent. The reasons lies in our system of checks and balances. Legal Latinos are a great asset and they help to build America. I work side by side with many of them. This is not an ethnic problem, it is a problem in illegality and corruption. Turning it into an issue of discrimination is an abuse of our judicial process.
Is it too much to ask that each person voting should be required to produce proof of citizenship and a valid photo ID.
A good 74% Americans support voter ID and even 71 % Latinos are in favor of voter ID. When Jerry Brown in California established the rule of no voting without ID it is suspicious that there was such a great deal of noise about it. Jerry Brown’s ruling, however, doesn’t go far enough: all illegal immigrants are easily able to get a valid drivers licence or if they do not drive go to DMV for an Identity card. Please, what is the big deal? The past reason for our prosperity is our laws and our constitution. Let us not forget this
Soros was paying for this voter drive and it seems the boots on the ground just want it easy. Were they paid by the voter? Too much smoke and mirrors. Definitely an area rife for an honest Congressional investigation.
Voters must prove they are legal before being allowed to vote.
But it gets worse, much worse
As we advance to the election of 2016 evidence is surfacing that we may indeed have an even bigger problem. There is a right way and a wrong way to count votes with computers and hello, its just not being done right. On the ground investigations like VERITAS are proving that we cannot place trust in the counting machines, two thirds now owned by the untrustworthy Soros.
So where do we stand, Democrats and Republicans in 2016? It is important to all voters that we are able to trust the vote. It seems it has become suspect because voters are not required to produce a valid ID at the polling booth but also because the counting machines fail to produce an honorable audit trail. Where does this leave us. It leaves us with the realization that we have a lot to do to fix up America even before we try to make it great again. We have to restore the integrity of the system.
- Our choice is “rule of law” OR the “might is right” arbitrary chaos that prevails in third worlds and the forced poverty and crime from down South
- Our choice is to “fight for our system and heritage” for it is balance of power that polices corruption so that we can all go out and learn a trade and get to work.
- Our choice is to sit back, do nothing, accept the false lure of a politically correct, rigged system while we struggle from pay-check to paycheck while our prices go up and up as they always do in all socialistic countries.
I think not.
In this election we have to, have to demand voter ID but also verify the accuracy of the voting lists – we have to ensure each person voting is validly here in this country and is legal. I have compassion for the illegal immigrant situation and will fight to get it fair and inclusive & functional, but first lets honor our heritage and do things right.
Each voter MUST produce photo ID to show they are who they say they are. Plain & simple. This is all possible using computers to verify registration and lists.
Having the computers count the votes is efficient, BUT IN THE HANDS OF THOSE WITH NO MORAL COMPASS this can create a rigged result. Sadly the country won’t accept a rigged result. The people have woken up. This could result in revolution, martial law and /or civil war. We don’t want this.
The legal consequences to tampering with vote counting machines is not yet clearly spelled out (but should be) Voter fraud knocks the very foundation of our system and culture.
There should be an independent body overseeing the process. It would only be possible if the post of AG were no longer politicized (appointed) but we let the AG becomes an elected office. It would filter down into the DOJ and we could have a judicial anchor.
We can start with each voter being willing to offer up a valid ID at the polling booth.
Quote for the Month
The greatest threat to the constitutional right to vote is voter fraud.
| About the Author
Lynn Verhoeff (Grandma Thunder) has published two books, “Politics IOU” and “Magic Money” both on Kindle. The first is satirical about banking and the second, examines the conflict of our times, Globalism vs Patiotism. You can read more at fb Grandma Thunder – an Independent Voice or Blog/Grandma Thunder or Free Books by Grandma